Media reported on Thursday morning, 25 December 2014, the launch of the so-called Future-Hezbollah Dialogue on Wednesday, 24 December 2014. This dialogue that was promoted by the media for several days as if it were “a silver bullet”! Only to surprise the people that entering of the Party of Iran in the raging killings in Syria, or its exit is not up for discussion and dialogue. As well as what is known as the weapon of “resistance” is not up for discussion and dialogue, and the eligibility of the presidency is also not under discussion and dialogue, as this is the concern of the ally of the Party of Iran, Michel Aoun ... However, it made the urgent and most important quest the subject of the so-called Saraya al-Moqawama (Resistance Brigades) and dissolving them! ... And that this meeting would assuage the Sunni-Shiite tension.
Here, we say: If all these issues are not in question, and not even urgent discourse, then on what dialogue do they speak?! As long as these issues are not debated by those causing them, why then the meeting and dialogue?! Consequently, were not these issues, as the future trend deluded its followers, fundamental issues?! So where did this fundamentalism go?! Or have the leaders of this trend disregard its public since it accepted to form a government with the party of Iran, Hezbollah, despite the reservations alleged since a long time ago?!
The answer to these queries has become obvious to everyone with vision and insight. Thus the decision to confrontation, or the decision to form a government, or to sit at the dialogue table… All these decisions had never been - and will never be – in the hands of the interlocutors of the Future Movement, or the Party of Iran, or those who sponsored the dialogue superficially. The decision of this kind was - and remains - subject to regional countries, who are the owners of the political money that feeds the interlocutors. Rather, it is subject to the major countries that were and still are planning for these regional states their movements and stillness, according to the interests of the major countries that do not observe concerning Lebanon and its people or the countries in the Islamic world any pact of kinship or covenant of protection. However, they put their calculations, plans and strategies above anything else, even if it was the blood of the people of Lebanon, Syria and the rest of the region…
As for the issue of dissolving “Saraya al-Moqawama”, does this require meetings and dialogues? Not even half a meeting or half a dialogue?! Cannot those who formed them see that they have become not more than mere clusters that have been took up weapons, and found support and cover, and even security institutions were prevented to bring one of them, except with a hail of bullets and shedding blood of pedestrians here and there… So does it require more than an immediate and momentary dissolution from those who claim a desire to stop the congestion and unite the rank?!
As for reducing the Sunni - Shiite tension, which the interlocutors made it a flashy title for this meeting, we wish it were true as well ... had not this been possible many years ago? Or that the external directives had not arrived yet?! And who had created this tension except those who shed the sacred blood of their people, the people of Lebanon and the people of Syria as a service for foreign agendas? Who instilled it except those who accepted to sit with them yesterday and today, only in compliance with the orders of their masters and their agendas?
The one having the interest in this congestion are the international masters who ordered everyone to sit down to the table of dialogue with the knowledge that it is merely a “pebble soup” which neither nourishes nor avails against hunger, but only continued procrastination and stalling due to floundering and confusion of their masters in solving the pressing issues in the region.
Ash-Sham’s revolution has surprised the regional and international players and their followers, due to the raising of the slogans of Islam in general, and the Khilafah on the method of the Prophethood, in particular, prompting these countries compulsorily to raise the tension in an attempt to thwart the awakening of the Ummah. Also to highlight the alleged “Caliphate” announced by ISIS (Da’ish) to bury the real liberating project of the Ummah; the Khilafah on the method of the Prophethood, of whom the sincere sons work towards it. Then attempt to silence all those carrying the word of truth pretexts of “terrorism”, “atonement” and “Da’ishism”! ...
Here is the Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem said in a statement published by Al-Hayat Newspaper in its edition on Monday, 29/12/2014, giving tiding of the result after a few days from the first dialogue meeting, saying: “The region today in the state of swaying; no solutions, no predominance, and no achievements. In other words, there is no solution soon in Syria nor in the face of Da’ish, nor in Saudi-Iranian relations and nor in the range of problems that exist in our region, including no solution soon in Lebanon for many of the outstanding issues for its association with the project in the region”.
O Sunnis and Shiites in Lebanon! O Muslims, as Allah named you by:
We in Hizb ut Tahrir/ Wilayah Lebanon invite you not to cling to false hopes and illusions promoted by the interlocutors and their masters; misleading and deception! We also urge you to support the workers, and even work with them to establish the Khilafah on the method of the Prophethood where everyone who will live under it, Muslim and non-Muslim shall enjoy peace. This is what Hizb ut Tahrir works for day and night in pursuit of the revival of the Ummah, including Lebanon and its people.
((إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَذِكْرَى لِمَنْ كَانَ لَهُ قَلْبٌ أَوْ أَلْقَى السَّمْعَ وَهُوَ شَهِيدٌ))
“Indeed in that is a reminder for whoever has a heart or who listens while he is present [in mind].” [Qaf: 37]